Monday, May 26, 2025

Speech to St. Catharines City Council Against Plan ("Business Case") of Anti-Encampment By-law

 



(NOTE: speech against the anti-encampment by-law itself was on April 29)

Hi Mayor and Councillors I’m Saleh Waziruddin as the mayor said.

One obvious problem with the business case is that we have 4 to 5 times the active encampments as Guelph, and a bigger area, from Appendix 1 of the report, but the same staffing is being proposed, possibly less. We’ve seen from the news that encampments just pop up again a few days later or somewhere else. But unhoused people’s situation is even worse the next time around so clean up costs will probably be even higher.

But even taking what’s proposed in the report, some of costs are one-time, but others are ongoing even if you are just going to take them once from the tax rate stabilization reserve. Annual licensing fees are obviously not one time, and the other costs are going to be rolled over into the next budget as ongoing operating costs.

The province’s handbook for Councillors (that’s you!) calls the tax rate stabilization reserve “reserves to help address changes in tax REVENUE,” they’re not for operating expenses. If this sounds familiar, it should be because last year the late Councillor Garcia had a budget amendment to take over $225,000 for the operating budget from this reserve. Staff said: “does not meet these criteria.” Staff explained last year “this reserve has been used for non-recurring or one-time expenses.”

If it was a bad idea in 2024 it’s still a bad idea in 2025. 

Last year’s staff report also pointed out 62% of this reserve is already committed, and more’s been spent since then. So the business case in front of you would take out more than 20% of the reserve, or almost half for the multi-year period.

And if you spend proportionately what Guelph spends per encampment, you would almost wipe out this reserve. That means when a truly one-off, unforeseen event happens, you won’t be able to have that cushion to spread out the effect on tax rates.

So what should you do if we can’t pay for what’s in the business case, or 4-5 times that? My absolute favorite line in the report: “If Council chooses not to approve the Business Case, staff recommends that the by-law be repealed.”

If you can’t pay to make it real, then you must repeal.

There are other problems with the business case that are more important than money.

Appendix 3 of your report says “shelter space availability not applicable” for Class II areas where people aren’t allowed to set up encampments AT ALL. This is staff’s flowchart of the By-law response and enforcement process. This goes against what you passed on the 29th because section 7.7, which is for ALL parts of the City, says:

“No order requiring the removal of a building, structure, or improvement, or the vacating of a location shall be issued under this By-law unless the City has first confirmed, either directly or in coordination with its housing partners, that supported accommodation space is available.... “

There’s an exception for emergencies but your own by-law says you have to check for shelter availability. And your debate on the 29th shows that you know there are legal reasons why you have to do this. This business case throws that out the window.

Then you go further down the flowchart to what happens if there’s a violation ANYWHERE in the City, Class I OR Class II. It says call the police and go to “Enforcement,” this is not my word it’s from the report in front of you, which says “Parties that obstruct may be prosecuted and could be subject to being arrested. This can include those who are encouraging non-compliance.”

Arrest means criminalization because it means handcuffs and jail, not fines and tickets. This is not an exaggeration. Ontario jails have such a bad reputation that a Scottish court is considering not extraditing people here for murder because it would be a human rights violation to be in an Ontario jail.

“Encouraging non-compliance” is so vague, people supporting the unhoused with just food feel targeted. Many are holding back because they’re afraid. That doesn’t mean more compliance, it means more fear but also more resistance which is not the result you are looking for. This is unnecessary. Arrests and going after those who are supporting (“encouraging”) the unhoused should also be taken off.

Last, the report says one of the key communications messages is “The by-law aims to regulate, not ban.” Regulation means how tall your tent can be or how many anchors it needs. Just because a ban is not a blanket ban doesn’t mean it’s not a ban. The definition for Class II, which is a lot of the City and where most encampments probably are, says “person must not engage in any of the following activities ...: erect, or cause to be erected, or occupy any temporary structure or shelter....” “Must not engage” is a ban by another name.

With this messaging you are saying things that are not true. The City should not be telling lies.

Thank you.


Friday, May 2, 2025

Homeless Camps Restricted in St. Catharines

 

https://www.105theriver.ca/news/local-news/homeless-camps-restricted-in-st-catharines/

Friday, 2 May 2025 17:46

By Geoff Waterfield

Council passes by-law, keeping them further from schools, parks, residential areas

Homeless camps are no longer allowed within certain distances of schools, cemeteries, and residential areas in St. Catharines.

Council recently passed a by-law by a 10-2 vote, meaning camps must be 100 metres away from schools, and 30 metres from residential areas.

Mayor Mat Siscoe argued there's too much crime such as drugs, human trafficking and more.

However, resident Saleh Waziruddin challenged homeless people need support.  "Halifax and Kelowna have done this.  They have affordable toilets and bottled water in places where they prefer encampments.  But, what you can't do is enforcement, or the iron fist, because that means punishing people for just trying to exist.  There are good reasons unhoused people go where they are going."

Mayor Siscoe added this is the #1 complaint the city hears about from residents.

After hearing advocates say that homeless people have suffered trauma, the mayor also agreed they should not be moved if nowhere to go.

However, he says there's been discussion about where camps can go.  "The city should not operate encampments.  We've seen what happens when that occurs, Hamilton has gone through that.  It's created a very difficult position and now cities like Hamilton that have authorized encampments are walking those policies back because they have not worked."

Councillor Bill Phillips added this is also about protecting the homeless from problems if living near residential areas.

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Speech Against Anti-Encampment By-Law at St. Catharines City Council




Hi Mayor and Councillors, I am Saleh Waziruddin.

When people are complaining about encampments or unhoused people near them, the only positive, or “helping hand,” thing you can do is to give supports in places where you prefer unhoused people to be. Halifax and Kelowna have done this: they have portable toilets and bottled water in places where they prefer encampments.

But what you can’t do is enforcement or the “iron fist” because that means punishing people for just trying to exist. There are good reasons unhoused people go where they are going. The right to exist outweighs any disturbance or disorder or costs people are complaining about.

The proposed bylaw says shelter will be found first before enforcement. But shelter doesn’t make sense for everyone and is just a cover for cruelty. Years ago I was told by a social worker I need to move in to a shelter for a temporary gain, which would have made my situation actually so much worse, and I asked her if she knows how senseless that suggestion was because like many people she had no practical sense of what it really means.

Many women especially refuse to go into shelters because of safety.

Unhoused people are where they are because that is the best option they have. You can improve the options with supports for encampments where you prefer them. Obviously the best option is supportive affordable and social housing. But until then you should use incentives, not punishment, to get what you want.

Fines are not going to be a deterrent, especially for every day or every PART of a day counting as a new offense, because many unhoused people can’t pay these fines anyway. They’re forced out of desperation to take risks like devastating punishments from the law for just trying to live. It makes even less sense to make unhoused people pay for removing their tents, “cost recovery” as the by-law calls it.

Punishing organizations for “concurring” with violations of the proposed by-law is dystopian. It’s punishing people and groups for trying to protecting unhoused people from discrimination.

Please don’t weigh disturbance for the housed more than right to exist for the unhoused. Most of us are just a short tragedy away from being forced into losing housing, even if we don’t want to see it.

Please don’t approve any steps against removing tents or temporary shelters anywhere. Please don’t use fines and other punishment to make a hard life even harder for people who can’t pay in the first place.

Thank you.

Monday, April 21, 2025

Muslim community members express frustration as politicians exploit voting blocs

https://thepointer.com/article/2025-04-21/muslim-community-members-express-frustration-as-politicians-exploit-voting-blocs 



First it was the Catholic churches where Italian-Canadians congregated after the war. Then it was the Sikh Gurdwaras. And now, the focus of more and more politicians during election season is the country’s diverse Muslim community. 

Younger generations who gather inside Mosques or socialize in other spaces, IRL or virtually, are questioning the tactics long used by political parties, particularly the Liberals and Conservatives, who see them as little more than pieces of a massive, game changing voting bloc in key parts of the country’s electoral map. 

"I feel like it's quite common. I do think that to a certain extent, it's exploitation," Gabriel Gebril, a spokesperson for the Niagara Palestine Coalition, told The Pointer. He says politicians are targeting vote-rich Muslim communities, courting diverse members during the election season, pandering for support without engaging them on the issues that really matter to communities.

 

Gabriel Gebril, a spokesperson for the Niagara Palestine Coalition, says politicians need to be connected with Muslim community members outside campaign season.

(Supplied)

 

"When a politician comes to the Mosque…outside of campaign season, they don't listen to their Muslim constituents. Their Muslim constituents have problems, and they're silent about them. So what I want to see from these politicians is, outside of election season, them talking to their Muslim constituents and listening to their Muslim constituents."

It’s nothing new in communities whose demographics present political opportunities for those willing to exploit the strength in numbers, and such tactics are certainly not out of bounds. But concerns have always followed the constant procession of politicians who arrive at places of worship or parade through other community spaces where ethno-religious groups can be convinced to offer their support. 

 

Patrick Brown at a Tamil Temple. He has admitted to exploiting the community for votes.

(Facebook)

 

Some even publicize their strategy to exploit these groups.

“By the time I announced my intention to run for Ontario Party leader in October [2014], I had lined up all sides of each of these communities—the four sides of the Sikh community and the three sides of the Tamil community,” Patrick Brown wrote in his 2018 tell-all memoir, which revealed some of the shameless but politically expedient tactics the former Ontario PC leader used to win that role when he was a longshot unknown who came out of nowhere to game the contest by taking advantage of a poorly designed delegate point system, admittedly exploiting ethno-religious communities.

“The Tamil community organizers told me when I announced my candidacy that they would be able to sweep the GTA for me.”

“During the campaign, we signed up around 10,000 Tamil members.”

Brown continued.

“In key ridings such as in Scarborough, where there were about 20,000 Tamil families per riding, my campaign team knew it would be a cakewalk for us. But I said to the team that the goal was to find Tamil families in other ridings.”

“In the weaker ridings, if we could get 500 Tamil members signed up to vote, we knew we’d have 80 per cent of that riding.”

The political influence of Canada’s Muslim community has grown like no other demographic in the country over the last 20 years. Nowhere has that expanding influence been more noticeable than in the region of Peel.

Between 2011 and 2021, Census figures from Statistics Canada show the Muslim population increased from 9.4 percent to 12.6 percent of Peel’s population, with 182,000 residents who identified as Muslim five years ago. Across Canada, the widely diverse Muslim population has grown rapidly, from just under 2 percent of the country in 2011 to 4.9 in 2021. According to projections there are just over 2 million Muslim-Canadians in the country currently.

And politicians like Patrick Brown now look for ways to exploit them for votes.

In 2022, when he was seeking the Conservative Party of Canada leadership to become prime minister in the current federal election, Brown tried to court the Muslim vote, telling a Montreal-based Arab language magazine that if he became PM he would not move Canada’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, a position backed by most Muslims. 

But when Jewish supporters learned of his comments in the Arab language publication, Brown immediately flip-flopped, saying he would move the embassy which is what many Jewish-Canadians support.

Saleh Waziruddin, a St. Catharines resident who has advocated on a range of priorities for many Muslim Canadians, says he has also seen this shapeshifting behaviour.  

"Many non-Muslim politicians assume that if they just approach one or two people with official titles, for example a person who is part of a Mosque’s board of directors, they will get the whole Muslim community (to automatically support them)," he told The Pointer. 

"They don't consider that what they have to do for the Muslim community is much more than just public relations. They just are interested in getting votes and getting donations, and unfortunately some of the people in leadership in the community fit that expectation that they don't make demands of the politicians sometimes, and they just give donations thinking that that will endear the politician to the community.”

Waziruddin said that many Muslims in the communities he is familiar with are tired of this malpractice by politicians, while they fail to take action on real issues impacting Canadians. He expressed his concern over the appearance of candidates at several community events, including Eid prayers, just to create the impression they support the community, while they search for votes.

Changing demographics and the spread of intolerance as a result led to the creation of the group The Canadian Muslim Vote, which engages community members on the issues impacting them. The organization engaged more than 15,000 people last year, and was involved in elections at all three levels of government, including the Alberta NDP leadership race and mayoral byelections in Toronto and Mississauga. It has also been active in the recent Ontario election and the federal election, helping inform community members so they are not as susceptible to politicians and so-called community leaders with their own agendas.

“We have seen political representatives across party lines dehumanize Muslims, question our loyalties, and cast baseless aspersions on our community,” the organization’s website warns. “Islamophobia continues to rise, exemplified by legislation like Bill-21 in Quebec and exacerbated by political rhetoric and inaction. Economic uncertainty has left many struggling with affordability, and policies affecting civil liberties remain unaddressed. All of this is happening at a time when the very sovereignty of our nation is coming under attack.”

To enhance the civic engagement of Muslim voters the organization’s Get Out The Vote campaign reached a milestone in 2019’s federal election by making five million points of contact with residents across Canada in partnership with more than 250 mosques. That included the efforts of staff members and volunteers who knocked on 10,000 doors and made 11,000 phone calls, while hitting 2.2 million impressions on social media platforms. With the help of the group’s efforts, after 2018’s Ontario provincial election a survey conducted by Mainstreet Research showed that 69 percent of the Muslim population eligible to vote did so, and in ridings where Candian-Muslims were engaged directly, the voter turnout reached all-time highs between 71 to 80 percent.

It’s why some in the community are not opposed to engaging with politicians at their places of worship. 

For Umair Ashraf, the executive director of The Canadian Muslim Vote, this is not considered a breach of ethics by political candidates, but rather an opportunity for residents to speak up about their discomfort around certain issues, when done with the community’s permission.

"What I would say… is ultimately each Masjid, or each Mosque, decides where they fall within their own strategies, and what they allow," he said. "But what we try to tell people is that one of the best ways of civic engagement is to engage with politicians or any representative, wherever you can. So obviously, go visit them at their offices, but also send emails and make phone calls. However, if they do take the time, or if they do come to the Masjid or the Mosque that they're canvassing and they're standing outside, that's a very good time to actually be able to talk about all the different points that you want to bring up."

He said those who feel their voices are not being heard in the political process should come forward and ask questions of their local candidates.

“It's important for them to then continuously speak up," he stressed. "Get some more people that may be feeling the same way, and start putting some more pressure on ensuring that they're able to have that dialogue, have that discussion, and then go from there. Because ultimately, as politicians, they have to answer to you because they are public servants….They're there for their constituents. They're there for the people in their communities. And it's a responsibility to be able to hold space and hold an area where they can have a dialogue and discussion."

Opportunistic politicians have long seized on the game changing potential of playing to this desire to be heard, identifying well defined voting blocs, showing up in their spaces and telling them what they want to hear.

Gebril expressed concern over appearances by politicians at prominent Mosque events, especially on Friday afternoon prayers, courting congregants for political gain.

"Let's take the Khutbah (Friday sermon), for example. On Friday, it can be deeply political. In fact, oftentimes it is a good thing when it's political: ‘Oh, this is what's going on in the community. Oh, the ummah (the wider community of Muslims) here needs X, Y, and Z.’ The Mosque can be a place where politics are welcome, but when politicians who are not part of the Muslim community, usually, and who are just cynically coming during election season… then, yeah, we're gonna get sick and tired of it, and we're gonna want to throw the baby out with the bathwater… In the Niagara region, we don't even see the politicians giving that much promise, like they'll come to the Mosque, and they'll take a photo op," he laments.

Key figures, he says, among the Muslim community are often part of the problem.

“People want the politics that are in the Mosque to represent what the Muslim people want, what the ummah want, not what big donors at the top of the Masjid hierarchy want."

 

Politicians routinely exploit the growing political influence of Muslim communities across Canada.

(Malton Islamic Centre)

 

This engagement rarely comes with any action to help the community in impactful ways, he says. Instead, candidates often use a divisive style of politics, just like Brown did when pitting Jewish-Canadians and Muslim-Canadians against each other, often triggering discord among residents in the same riding, telling each side they are with them in their opposition toward the other.

Brown did the same with the Ukrainian and Palestinian communities, offering his support to those who opposed the Russian invasion of Ukraine, then turning around and telling Palestinian Canadians they were not getting the same support, in hopes of currying favour. Brown has long done the same with Canada’s Tamil community, aggressively pressuring members for votes, claiming he is one of few politicians in the country who has stood up for Tamils opposed to the Sinhalese rule in Sri Lanka. 

Waziruddin would like to see those in positions of influence behave more responsibly. "Some of the people who are in positions of influence in the Muslim community, their approach is that if they donate without asking anything, the politician will then be in favour of the Muslim community. But the track record shows that that's not the case."

Politicians attend Muslim community events to enlarge their vote bank, he says, but there are risks behind this type of blatant pandering.

"There's definitely no good results from these tactics. So there is a divide in the sense that many members of the Muslim community are demanding accountability from elected officials and action, but some in the Muslim community who are in positions of influence are not trying to robustly hold the elected officials accountable, and they're just trying to figure out how to be more accepted by the politicians, instead of the other way around."

Brown, the Brampton mayor, has been heavily criticized for his egregious exploitation of ethno-religious groups, including Muslims and Sikhs.

After heavily courting the Muslim vote in 2018, he remained silent on his close friend Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s disturbing move to strip Muslims in India of citizenship rights. He finally posted a brief statement expressing concern over the move, without mentioning Modi or his Hindu-nationalist BJP government, and that was only after sustained pressure from some of Brampton’s large Muslim groups that Brown had targeted for support to help win the mayor’s seat. 

 

Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown has openly acknowledged his political strategy of using vote-rich  ethno-religious groups for political gain.

(X)

 

The Pointer has been contacted by readers about candidates in the federal election attending Mosques in Brampton and Mississauga, raising concern about the ongoing practice.  

Gebril said that instead of falling into the trap of these political candidates, the community should be more focused on staying in contact with elected officials throughout the year rather than in election season only.

"We need to make our voices heard, not once, not twice, not just around special occasions and elections, but constantly… if we want to be politically savvy, if we want to be politically effective, we have to know where our strengths and weaknesses lie.” 

He says communities eventually learn that they hold the power.

“I think that the Muslim community here is strong, but they don't show their strength. They don't ask for what they deserve."

 

 

The Pointer's 2025 federal election coverage is partly supported by the Covering Canada: Election 2025 Fund. 

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Officials dragged feet on police body cams (Letter to editor, Niagara Dailies)

https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/niagara-letters-jan-30-lower-taxes-should-not-be-expectation-of-amalgamation/article_8f6fd667-a08b-57fc-a09d-b767ab195b4b.html 


The article on Niagara Regional Police finally moving on body cameras says in 2020 the former police chief said he “ … believed it should be a provincial discussion to ensure a unified approach across Ontario,” which can make it seem like police just wanted a broader discussion.

Actually, Chief Bryan MacCulloch said they should wait for “guidance and direction from the Ministry of the Solicitor General.” 

It’s also what elected officials said when they voted against the recommendation for body cameras from the City of St. Catharines’ anti-racism advisory committee. Black residents asked for this, but councillors chose not to listen, using the police excuse.

Police kept telling us the direction should be from the provincial government, but are now moving without that direction after all, lagging behind almost every major Ontario police force. The others did it partly because residents asked them to — but in Niagara, both police and municipal councillors ignore racialized residents.

We aren’t keeping police and elected officials accountable if we don’t hold up what they say against their record.

Saleh Waziruddin, St. Catharines, Niagara Region Anti-Racism Association executive committee member


Thursday, January 23, 2025

Speech to Niagara Region Council in Support of Motion Opposing Use of Notwithstanding Clause to Remove Encampments of the Unhoused


 

Councillors I am Saleh Waziruddin and we voted for you to give us a helping hand, not the iron fist.

Using the nothwitstanding clause would take away not just the charter and legal rights of the unhoused but also their human rights.

Fines and prison mean criminalization, don’t let anyone tell you any different. Our eyes are not deceiving us, the letter signed by a minority of the Ontario Big City Mayors calls for fines and prison for at least some of the unhoused for just trying to exist.

How can cities give a helping hand when housing and health are provincial issues?

Halifax and Kelowna have encampment areas where staff provide portable toilets and water bottles. It’s not housing but the cities make it more attractive to camp there than other places instead of criminalization.

Otherwise unhoused people are being driven literally underground like in Edmonton where an unhoused man was found in a cave.

So what should you do to stop unhoused people camping where people are complaining? Nothing!

This is not just my recommendation, the United Nations says that in its report on the criminalization of homelessness and poverty. It says even if people refuse emergency shelter they should not be punished because that would be punishing them for the State’s failure to comply with international human rights law. This isn’t me it’s the UN’s special rapporteur.

In one of your municipal councils the mayor asked what do you do to stop people who refuse treatment. The answer again – nothing! From the United Nations report, there are complex reasons why people refuse treatment or emergency shelter and why treatment may not meet their needs.

It’s no surprise the UN report says vagrancy laws can be traced to the ongoing legacy of colonialism, slavery, and apartheid. The UN report says criminalization costs multiple times what housing does and just makes a revolving door between prison and the street.

Unhoused people can’t comply with laws that criminalize them because they are just trying to exist.

The Ontario Big City Mayors as a group rejected asking for invoking the notwithstanding clause but it’s telling that the minority of mayors who did, in their letter invoked the US Supreme Court decision, but that decision wasn’t unanimous. The dissenting opinion, by those who weren’t picked by Trump, written by Justice Sotomayor, said punishing people for their housing status is “cruel and unusual” for what is a biological necessity, not a crime. Those are the US Supreme Court justices we should be looking to if any, not the Trump appointees.

It’s no exaggeration to say the iron fist, or “tough love” as some are calling it, has the smell of fascism because it’s pandering to the privileged at the expense of the basic existence of the most marginalized. The Region’s latest homelessness count showed 28% of Niagara’s unhoused are Indigenous, and your own report called for “culturally sensitive” solutions, not overriding their human rights.

Thank you.