Surprise Attack! Revolution carried through by small conscious minorities

Surprise Attack! Revolution carried through by small conscious minorities
Kabul in the Republican Revolution of 1973

Thursday, December 23, 2004

Excerpts from Department of Homeland Security Interview at Peace Bridge Border Crossing, Buffalo, New York

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION


RECORD OF SWORN STATEMENT


OFFICE: Peace Bridge, Buffalo, New York

FILE # A 97 914 835

STATEMENT BY: WAZIRUDDIN, Syed Sualeh

IN THE CASE OF: Your admission to the United States

AT: Peace Bridge, Buffalo, New York

DATE: December 23, 2004

BEFORE: Officer DAVIES


IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.


I am an officer of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, authorized by law to administer oaths and take testimony in connection with the enforcement of Immigration and Nationality laws of the United States.  I desire to take your sworn statement regarding: Your admission to the United States, today.


[snip]


Q. Are you a member of any groups, organizations or affiliations in the United States or Canada?

A. Yes.

Q. Of which groups are you a member?

A. American Automobile Association, Islamic Center of Pittsburgh.

Q. What is the level of your involvement with the Islamic Center of Pittsburgh?

A. I am the president of the outreach committee.

Q. What types of activities do you take part in or organize in that position?

A. Open houses, so non-Muslims can learn about Islam and see mosques.

Q. Do you take part in any protests or demonstrations in the United States?

A. I did in the past.

Q. What were you previously demonstrating or protesting against?

A. Cuts in transit services, war, special registration.

Q. Political literature was found in your vehicle that would lead an average person to conclude that you have strong political views against the United States, and/or its current administration, is that correct?

A. No, I disagree with the administration, but I don’t have strong views against either.

Q. Why are you transporting such materials across an international border?

A. That was not my intention, I have stuff in my car that people give to me, I don’t clean my car very often.  In hindsight, I should keep my car clean, and not transport political literature.

Q. When were you last involved in a demonstration or protest?

A. Summer of 2003.

Q. Where was it held?

A. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania?

Q. Have you ever organized or lead a demonstration or protest of any kind?

A. I took part in organizing protests.

Q. In Pittsburgh?

A. Yes.

Q. What activities were included in the protests you organized or participated in?

A. Speeches, activities were all non-violent.


(pg. 9)

Q. Have you ever, or do you plan to take actions against the United States, or its government?

A. No.

Q. Do you have any intentions of participating in or organizing demonstrations or protests that are of a violent, or non-peaceful nature?

A. No.

Q. Do you have any knowledge of activities, that you may or may not participate in, that are against the United States government?

A. No.


[snip]


I have read (or have had read to me) the foregoing statement, consisting of 9 pages.  I state that the answers made therein by me are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that this statement is a full, true, and correct record of my interrogation on the date indicated by the above-named officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. I have initialed each page of this statement [and the correction(s) notes on page(s) ____.


Signature of alien


Subscribe and sworn to before me at Peace Bridge

Buffalo.


Signature of Immigration Officer


Date

12/23/04


Signature of Witness

(Sonia M …oxce)

Date

12/23/04

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

Fact Sheet – US Government refuses me admission to the US and detains, questions me

Summary:

* On Tuesday, November 16 I, Syed Sualeh (“Saleh”) Waziruddin, was refused admission into the United States at the US-Canada Border at Peace Bridge (between Fort Erie and Buffalo).

* the Free Trade Officer who administers the kind of visa I was renewing told me he had been watching me since my last trip to the border and that I could be seen as taking jobs away from Americans, asked me what would happen if I was put on a flight to Pakistan or Saudi Arabia (countries I am not a citizen of), and that James Earl Ray (Martin Lither King Jr.'s assassin) too had a Canadian passport and had said he was born in Canada (I was born in Canada and am a citizen only of Canada)

* The Free Trade Officer then had my car searched, and after peace vigil posters and fliers were found I was locked up in a cell without being told how long I would be detained for, I was searched, fingerprinted three times (twice on computer and once on paper), photographed twice, and questioned by two Immigration agents who asked me about my political beliefs and theological opinions

* I was renewing my TN (Treaty NAFTA) work visa as a Canadian citizen, which I have had and renewed annually over the last 6 years.  The official reason I was given was that I don’t own or rent property in Canada, which was not a problem for the last 6 times I applied.  I was told informally and implicitly that peace posters and Islamic Center open house materials found in my car where what “started all this”.  I was told the rule about owning or renting property was always there but this time it’s being strictly enforced.

* I have no alleged (or existing) ties to criminal or terror organizations, and none have been alleged by the US government at any time, no evidence has ever been cited.


Violation of rights:

* I asked for representation from my Consulate (Canadian Consulate in Buffalo which also services Pittsburgh) three times, as well as a chance to call a lawyer from my own cell phone, but these requests were effectively denied.  I was once told “you don’t understand, you’re in the border now” and that I would be locked up for “a while”.

* I was questioned about non-violent peace vigils (location, my role), about my views on US foreign policy, and I was asked for names of people helping the Muslim community with Immigration issues, as well as how I knew my labour movement contacts, and opinions on Islamic theology

* The questions I was asked were based on posters for peace vigils (non-violent), a flier from Black Voices for Peace, a flier against sweatshop conditions in Bangladesh, and materials from an Open House at the Islamic Center of Pittsburgh

* I was told I am on a list of people the US Government is “interested in”


Background/Biography:

* I am a Canadian citizen born to Indian and Pakistani parents and grew up in Saudi Arabia, I am a Muslim

* In 2002 I was involved in the successful year-long effort to free an Ethiopian immigrant arrested as a terrorist (www.freegetu.org, info packet at

http://www.freegetu.org/materials/facts/GetuInfoPak_v4-3.htm)

* I have been involved with the Islamic Council of Greater Pittsburgh’s Anti-Discrimination Committee, examples include a protest against special registration

(http://www.postgazette.com/localnews/20030222protestmainreg4p4.asp),

working with the ACLU on a Volunteer Lawyer System for people undergoing special registration

(http://www.postgazette.com/localnews/20030316special0316ap3.asp),

and helping with individual cases

(http://www.postgazette.com/pg/03168/193416.stm)

* I am also on the Islamic Center of Pittsburgh’s Outreach Committee and help arrange Open Houses (e.g.

http://www.pittnews.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/09/14/4146645c99256)

* From 2002-2004 I was the Board President of the Thomas Merton Center, a 30-year peace and justice non-profit organization www.thomasmertoncenter.org,

http://www.pittnews.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2002/09/24/3d8fcf0f6b2df?in_archive=1)

Contact Points:  I am currently staying in Niagara Falls, Ontario Canada: I can be telephoned at 412 654 6047, receive letters at 4025 Dorchester Road, Apt 146, Niagara Falls, ON L2E 7K8, e-mailed at salehw@yahoo.com.  I am still investigating the background of what was done and can be done.

Thursday, October 14, 2004

Patriot Act Town Meeting Brings Together Residents of Edgewood and Neigboring Communities

(from Pittsburgh Indymedia http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2004/10/15934.php

Patriot Act Town Meeting Brings Together Residents of Edgewood and Neigboring Communities

by Mary Thursday, Oct. 14, 2004 at 8:32 AM
mary@indypgh.org

Residents of Edgewood as well as other east suburban communities and Regent Square gathered on Wednesday night to hear more about the USA-Patriot Act.

Patriot Act Town Mee...
149-4906b_img.jpgekaqfh.jpg, image/jpeg, 640x480

Aproximately 40 people attended an informational meeting to hear about the USA Patriot Act and ask questions of panelists.

The program was organized by a group of Edgewood residents and a resident of neighboring Swissvale. Program organizers hoped to increase peoples' understanding of the Patriot Act and initiate discussion as to whether the community might want pass a Patriot-Act related resolution, as have Pittsburgh and nearby Wilkinsburg.

Panelists presenting information and answering questions were Omar Slater of the ACLU, Saleh Waziruddin of the Islamic Center of Pittsburgh, and Denise Edwards of Wilkinsburg Borough Council.

Mr. Slater presented details of the Act and warned that individuals could be labeled terrorists for belonging to activist groups; "sneak and peek" home searches can be done without warrants and without the knowledge of the resident; emails and visits to web sites can be monitored and by the FBI, and medical records and library usuage are also fair game. Additionally, it is illegal for the person or provider who who has been asked to provide information about you to inform you of this. In short, said Slater, there is no judical review and no probable cause.

Denise Edwards, Wilkinsburg Council member, said that the Patriot Act did not provide any assistance (such as funding for training) that would enable first responders (police, fire, ambulance) to do a better job of responding to real threats, terrorist or otherwise, and suggested that resources might be better directed. Wilkinsburg's passage of a resolution regarding the Patriot Act sent a message that activities such as surveillance must go through local elected officials. Ms. Edwards encouraged attendees to talk up Patriot-Act related issues and consider taking action.

Saleh Wazirudden discussed cases of individuals that had come up locally and nationally, including that of Getu, who was arrested at a Greyhound bus stopover in Pittsburgh on suspicion of being a terrorist. Mr. Wazirudden noted wryly that Getu was not a Muslim but was actually a Christian.

Not all audience members agreed that the Patriot Act was problematic, and one individual disputed some of the claims that were made by panelists.

Edgewood Borough Council member Heidi McDonald attended to find out more about both the Patriot Act and the feelings of her constituents. Edgewood Police Chief Wood had been invited to attend and participate in the question-and-answer portion of the meeting, but was not at the meeting.

This meeting will be followed up by a meeting to discuss a possible resolution.

add your comments

Denise Edwards, Saleh Wazirudden, and Omar Slater
by Mary Thursday, Oct. 14, 2004 at 8:32 AM
mary@indypgh.org

Denise Edwards, Sale...
149-4902b_img.jpg178ztd.jpg, image/jpeg, 585x483

Sunday, May 9, 2004

A Familiar Madness (Letter to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

Letters to the editor: 5/9/04
Sunday, May 09, 2004
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A familiar madness

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan mischaracterizes City Council's anti-USA Patriot Act resolutions as disrupting law enforcement ("The Patriot Act Is Not What They Say," May 2 Forum). The resolutions don't stop any laws from being enforced but show that Pittsburghers oppose fishing expeditions against everyone's rights. She should appreciate the cooperation of Pittsburghers in getting their city to take a stand, not just the cooperation among law enforcement agencies.

Ms. Buchanan says opponents of the Patriot Act think the problem is with agents acting without courts. No, the problem is bigger. No matter who authorizes them, "sneak and peek" searches put us all under an invisible microscope used by paranoid minds.

Real law enforcement is not shakedowns motivated by discrimination and fear. Ms. Buchanan assumes the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act gives oversight but doesn't tell us its origins in the Church Committee's investigation of FBI abuses. Except instead of ending the abuses they were merely regulated.

In the 1990s FISA put activist Kurt Stand behind bars because a court let the FBI entrap him based only on his name appearing in an old East German file. Kurt's children are being supported by the Rosenberg Fund for Children, set up by Julius and Ethel's son. It's no coincidence that victims of 1950s paranoia are helping today's victims.

For all the technology and efficiency the government hypes, we also need to look at what's behind their use. It took decades for the Church and Pike committees to finally form after the American people exposed pervasive abuse.

The resolutions don't stop real law enforcement but show we are standing up to a familiar madness.

S. SALEH WAZIRUDDIN
Shadyside
Editor's note: The writer is chair of the Anti-Discrimination Committee of the Islamic Council of Greater Pittsburgh



Tuesday, June 17, 2003

La Roche student's lawyers seek bond hearing (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

https://www.post-gazette.com/news/nation/2003/06/17/La-Roche-student-s-lawyers-seek-bond-hearing/stories/200306170030

La Roche student's lawyers seek bond hearing

Jordanian, 21, held without bail in York for failing to register

Lawyers are seeking bond for a Jordanian student from La Roche College being held in York County Prison for failing to register with immigration authorities.

Abdelqader K. Abu-Snaineh, a 21-year-old junior, was arrested last week on campus. He has been held without after being categorized as a Level 1 detainee, the highest risk classification.

Abu-Snaineh failed to meet an April 25 deadline that was part of a massive, post-9/11 federal effort to register thousands of men from 25 mostly Muslim countries.

Some 144,000 people registered under that program, and more than 13,000 of them face deportation because of visa violations, but Abu-Snaineh is one of the first to be picked up solely for failing to register.

He had no prior immigration violations, his visa was valid and he is a student in good standing at the college.

A spokeswoman for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not know how many people have been detained for failing to register.

"My impression is that there are not many people missed" during the Special Registration period, said Sarah Mouw.

His lawyers say that Abu-Snaineh is being classified as a high-risk detainee without justification.

"It will be very interesting to see what happens at this bond hearing," said Witold Walczak, legal director of the Pittsburgh ACLU, which is representing Abu-Snaineh. "We'll see if they maintain that this guy is a security or flight risk."

Abu-Snaineh's lawyers believe his case will be the first test of the Bush administration's response to a blistering internal critique of its handling of post-Sept. 11 detainees.

The report by the inspector general of the U.S. Justice Department blasted federal authorities for classifying detainees as high-risk with little evidence to support it, holding people without bond for long periods of time, denying detainees access to lawyers, and mistreating prisoners in detention facilities.

"The Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement position on not letting [Abu-Snaineh] out on bail is coming a week after the inspector general crucified the administration for designating detainees as terrorists" without justifying the classification, said Walczak.

Walczak said it will be the first indication of whether the federal government intends to follow through on its announcement last week that it plans to incorporate changes recommended in the inspector general's report.

Mouw, the bureau spokeswoman, said that failure to register did not automatically trigger Level 1, nor did it mean the detainee should automatically be held without bond.

"That would be on a case-by-case basis," said Mouw. "It would depend on so many other factors."

Abu-Snaineh was transported from the Allegheny County Jail to York County Prison Friday, and is now waiting to see whether he will be granted a bond hearing in Immigration Court there. He faces deportation proceedings.

Robert Whitehill, an immigration attorney who is representing Abu-Snaineh on behalf of the ACLU, last week sought to have the bond hearing via telephone so that Abu-Snaineh could remain here. Yesterday he got notice that immigration authorities in York refused to accept his bond appeal because Abu-Snaineh was now in York. Whitehill refiled the appeal yesterday and hopes to hear today.

He will argue that his client should not be categorized as a high-risk detainee.

Jordan is among the countries targeted by the Special Registration program, which required males 16 and older to report to immigration authorities to be fingerprinted, photographed and interviewed in an effort to identify nonresident aliens with connections to terrorism.

Though the program was aimed at terrorism, it has found many more immigration violators than terrorists. Of the 13,434 people detained, 136 people were arrested on criminal charges. No information on whether any of those criminal charges involved terrorism is available, said Mouw.

The Islamic Council of Greater Pittsburgh and Jamaat for Justice, local organizations that alerted the American Civil Liberties Union and immigration lawyers of the arrest, have been in touch with Abu-Snaineh from the beginning, said Saleh Waziruddin, who has been working to help Abu-Snaineh. The local Muslim community has secured more than $1,500 in pledges to help pay Abu-Snaineh's bond, should his request for bail be granted in York, Waziruddin said.

La Roche notified the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement that Abu-Snaineh hadn't registered by the deadline.

The college later issued a statement from Ken Service, vice president for institutional relations, which said that the school's "original determination on this issue was based on what we believed was a correct interpretation of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement regulations," and that the interpretation is now being reviewed. Service said yesterday that review was still going on.

The school is in touch with Abu-Snaineh's attorneys and supports bail for him. He said that both he and college President Monsignor William Kerr "stand ready to do whatever appears to be helpful in this case."

First Published June 17, 2003, 12:00am




Sunday, March 16, 2003

Muslim men register warily under U.S. requirement as terror precaution (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

Muslim men register warily under U.S. requirement as terror precaution

Sunday, March 16, 2003

By Lillian Thomas, Post-Gazette Staff Writer

In Room 314 of the federal building Downtown, Muslim men wait in rows of gray chairs each day to be fingerprinted, photographed and questioned under oath about their immigration status, their families and their finances.



Saleh Waziruddin, 25, a Pakistani who is a citizen of Canada and a graduate student at the University of Pittsburgh, has spoken up against the Special Registration program, helped organize a protest against the policy and is working with the effort to get legal assistance for all who have to register. (Robin Rombach, Post-Gazette)

"You sign in, you get a number, then are called to a window," said a Saudi graduate student who recently went through what's called Special Registration, a program aimed at registering men -- no women -- in the United States who are citizens or nationals of 25 countries identified by the Justice Department as bases for terrorist groups.

Friday is the deadline for the third group required to register, men from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

"An agent takes your passport," said the 31-year-old, who asked that his name not be used but who described the process in detail: After waiting and watching for a door at the rear of the room to open, he was escorted to an area of cubicles where his documents were reviewed.

Next, he was asked where he was born, the names and addresses of his parents, as well as their birth dates. In addition, he was asked for credit card and bank account numbers. Although officials sometimes ask questions about "national security or law enforcement nature," the Saudi wasn't asked.

Finally, he was fingerprinted, photographed and given a registration stamp.

The men found to have violated the terms of their visas (by overstaying the time limit or not carrying the number of classes required for a student visa, for example) are usually taken for further questioning. Those found to be "out of status" are detained and either held in jail or let out on bond to await deportation proceedings.

The Special Registration program was announced by the Justice Department late last year with so little fanfare that many in the first group required to register didn't learn about it until their deadline had passed.

In December, Immigration and Naturalization Service officials in California detained more than 400 men who were attempting to register, handcuffing them and herding them into the Los Angeles federal building's basement lockup. That instantly spread the word about the program throughout communities of aliens from the 25 countries on the list which, with the exception of North Korea, are predominantly Muslim.

"If you were called down -- you, a European-American who's a citizen -- if you got a call to come down to some government office, you'd be a little bit nervous," said Vic Walczak, legal director of the Pittsburgh chapter of the Americans Civil Liberties Union. "But many of the registrants come from countries where responding to a call from the government could be your last volitional act. In many places, people are called to the police station and never emerge, or come out missing limbs. There is a real distrust and fear of government."

When he and immigration attorney Robert Whitehill gave a presentation on Special Registration in December, they ran right into that fear.

"I'm looking out on an audience of 150 people, the vast majority of them Arab-looking males, and the stress and anxiety on their faces was palpable," said Walczak.

 
 
Registration deadlines: Two to go

Special registration started with male aliens (nonimmigrant visitors to the United States) over the age of 16 who are citizens or nationals of five countries: Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya.

The second group of countries includes Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Eritrea, Lebanon, Morocco, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Somalia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. Deadlines for both these groups have passed.

Group III, with a registration deadline of Friday, consists of aliens from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

Group IV countries are Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan and Kuwait. The deadline is April 25.

Men from the affected countries who are just coming to the United States will be registered in the ports where they arrive. Those already here must appear at Bureau of Citizenship and Immigrant Services (formerly Immigration and Naturalization Service) offices to be photographed, fingerprinted and interrogated.

Those who register are required to return each year for an interview; to report changes of address, employment and school; and to depart and enter the country from only designated ports.

Information required at the interviews includes documentation showing that the person is legally in the country, personal data, information on the person's parents (including their dates of birth and addresses and phone numbers), credit card and bank account numbers. Registrants are permitted to bring a lawyer and a translator if necessary.

If his immigration status is in order, the person will be given a registration number and have his documentation stamped, indicating he is registered. If he is in violation of immigration rules, he will be detained, and either held in jail or released on bond to await deportation proceedings.

"For the purpose of the interview, it is in your favor to think creatively and to bring as much documentation as possible," reads a portion of the BCIS Web page on Special Registration. "You may also be asked additional questions of a national security or law enforcement nature."

Those who do not follow these procedures "may be subject to arrest, detention, fines and/or removal from the United States," according to the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services. "Any future application for an immigration benefit from the United States may be adversely impacted."

  
 

Members of the Muslim community, the ACLU and immigration attorneys quickly organized to explain the process, get the word out among those required to register and recruit lawyers to work with them. About 70 lawyers have volunteered to offer their services free as part of the program organized by the ACLU and the Pittsburgh Regional Immigrant Assistance Center, a division of Jewish Family and Children's Services in Squirrel Hill.

Last Sunday, lawyers who volunteered went to the Islamic Center in Oakland for a training session on Special Registration. Afterward, eight lawyers met with men who have not yet registered to advise them and make plans to accompany them to their interviews in the federal building.

Won't disclose local data

The Justice Department announced Special Registration as a component of the effort to identify potential terrorists. Under criticism that the program amounted to profiling -- singling people out based on race, religion or national identity-- spokesman Jorge E. Martinez said in January that the countries were chosen because intelligence information indicated a presence of al-Qaida or other terrorist organizations there.

The INS ceased to exist March 1 and its employees and services were put under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The newly created Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services is handling Special Registration.

As of last week, 88,989 people had registered, about half in ports of entry, the other half at INS (or BCIS) offices, according to BCIS spokesperson Amy Otten. Officials have detained 1,745 of them for not being in compliance with immigration regulations, and issued 4,825 notices to appear before immigration authorities for immigration rule violations.

The program has resulted in the arrest of 46 people on criminal charges. Asked if any of those arrests were terrorism-related, Otten said: "Not that I'm aware of. That's not provided." She said she could not provide numbers of people registered or detained for local BCIS offices. George Hess, the agent in charge of the Pittsburgh BCIS, said he was not permitted to give out local data.

Officials now seem to be de-emphasizing the terror component, instead characterizing the program as the first step in keeping track of all nonimmigrant visitors to the United States.

"The purpose actually is to register people who are here legally to make sure they get into the system so we can make sure they leave, or if they don't leave, we know about it," said Otten. "By 2005, we will end up with a complete entry-exit system.

That does not mean, however, that the estimated 35 million nonimmigrants who enter the country each year will have to register in the same way. "The system is not necessarily going to be universal. I don't think we necessarily know what it will look like," said Otten.

But critics ask that if this program isn't about fighting terrorism, then why are some groups being singled out for attention. For example, why isn't the government tracking women, or how were the first 25 countries chosen for inclusion. Otten said the Justice Department made those decisions and she could not comment.

During their interviews, registrants must provide names, birth dates, addresses and phone numbers for their parents. That would seem to suggest the U.S. government wants the means to track visitors after they return home.

Registrants also must give bank account numbers and credit card numbers as well as any other "identifying numbers."

Gina Godfrey of the Pittsburgh Regional Immigrant Assistance Center said she had never been given a rationale for that requirement.

"I don't know if they're checking to see if the person is buying bomb-making equipment," she said.

Critics say it's a clumsy way to try to snare terrorists.

"If you're a terrorist, either you'll be sure your papers are in order and they're not going to find anything, or if there's something suspicious about your background, you won't go in to register," said the ACLU's Walczak.

'Picking on one group'

Otten said the agency was not relying exclusively on people voluntarily coming forward. "We have our agents out on the street, we get information from a variety of sources," said Otten. "If people [who have not registered] come to our attention, we'll visit them."

Though there have been complaints of heavy-handedness in other cities, those who have registered in Pittsburgh say agents here are professional and that it is more a bureaucratic hassle than anything.

Immigration lawyer Robert Whitehill says Special Registration is transforming an already bureaucratic system into one "that is intimidating, is humiliating." But, he said, there are no clear legal grounds for challenging Special Registration.

"While for many purposes an alien in the U.S. is entitled to the rights of a citizen, fundamentally, requiring registration has withstood the test of time," he said. Iranian students had to go into INS offices to answer questions during the hostage crisis of 1979-81, for example.

Nevertheless, he said, "It offends my sense of what it means to be American. Whatever they say, of course it's picking on one group. The arguments that it's just part of a program that's eventually going to include more groups may hold legal water, but the consequences are going to take years and years to repair."

Those effects could include deterioration of international relations, people deciding against coming to the United States, and distrust and anxiety among immigrant communities.

All but one of the dozen men interviewed for this article asked that their names not be used, including some involved in organizing last week's seminar. They said some of their fellow students declined to attend the seminar, asking to meet one-on-one with an attorney rather than going to a public gathering.

Saleh Waziruddin, 25, a Pakistani who is a citizen of Canada and a graduate student at the University of Pittsburgh, has spoken up against Special Registration, helped organize a protest against the policy and is working with the effort to get legal assistance for all who have to register. But he didn't want to be public about his efforts at first, he said, and understood why others are reluctant.

"I did have qualms about it. And others have the same qualms."

"A threat to humanity"

A Saudi graduate student studying at the University of Pittsburgh recalled his registration experience. He had to register at JFK Airport after a recent visit home.

"After a flight of 15 hours from Saudi Arabia, we were directed to a room with about 50 seats in it. There were about 250 people in the room from my flight," said the 27-year-old. "There was no place to get anything to eat, except a vending machine that was broken." He, his wife and his children, ages 2 and 4, waited from 9 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., missing their flight to Pittsburgh.

He was anxious, he said, but his parents -- awaiting his call confirming his arrival -- were frantic. Though Special Registration has received little attention in the United States, in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and many other countries, it is front-page news. During his visit, he said, "I had spent many hours trying to convince my parents it was OK to go back."

When he finally arrived in Pittsburgh and called his parents, "The first words from my father were, 'You told me I didn't have to worry.' "

Saudi students said friends who had scholarships and were choosing where to attend graduate school were switching from schools in the United States to England, Canada and Australia.

Some students in Pittsburgh said they were considering returning home or transferring.

Another Saudi, a 30-year-old, electrical-engineering graduate student at Pitt, said he wanted to visit his father, who has been ill. But he's been putting it off. "Believe me, I'm afraid I won't be able to come back." Students fear that if they've increased their number of work-study hours beyond what's allowed or dropped a course or gotten a parking ticket, they could be found to be "out-of-status" and deported, he said.

"I understand that the situation is tough," he said. "There is a threat to the U.S. I think it's a threat to humanity. If there is reason to interview someone because of suspicious behavior, that's fine. But I don't think it's right, I don't think it's fair, to interview everyone."

Whitehill echoed the feelings of others who remembered that other ugly episodes of discrimination and worse started with such measures. There was a registration program for people of Japanese descent before internment began during World War II, for example.

"And that's the way it started in Germany," said Whitehill. "I'm Jewish. That resonates."

Saturday, February 22, 2003

30 demonstrators protest tracking of Muslim males (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

 30 demonstrators protest tracking of Muslim males

Saturday, February 22, 2003

By Torsten Ove, Post-Gazette Staff Writer

While the usual Friday naturalization ceremonies for new citizens wrapped up at the federal courthouse Downtown yesterday, a knot of 30 people turned out at the Federal Office Building across the street to protest the treatment of Muslim immigrants in John Ashcroft's America.



A group of Muslims prays yesterday outside the Federal Office Building, Downtown. The group, organized by Jamaat for Justice, was demonstrating because it believes the Bush administration is unfairly targeting minorities in the war on terror. (John Beale, Post-Gazette)

Their specific complaint is the "special registration" of males over 16 from mainly Muslim countries who will be fingerprinted, photographed and questioned by the U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service.

The protesters, organized by Jamaat for Justice, a Pittsburgh-based Muslim activist group, said the Bush administration is unfairly targeting minorities in the war on terror, just as America has done before in times of crisis.

"John Ashcroft, read a history book," said Witold Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union. "When you restrict freedom and individual rights, you are doing more harm than good."

Walczak invoked government crackdowns on Bolsheviks in the 1920s, Japanese-Americans during World War II and Communists in the McCarthy era.

"Were we any safer? No," he said. "A whole bunch of innocent people got screwed."

Saleh Waziruddin, a Canadian citizen who has dual Pakistani citizenship, organized the protest. An engineer at Carnegie Mellon University's Center for Advanced Fuel Technology, he'll have to register, a process he says amounts to profiling based merely on faith and national origin.

"It targets people based on where they're from, not on evidence," he said. "We don't want them to go after people just for what country they come from."

After a few speakers addressed the group, a few of them knelt on rugs and chanted prayers while federal employees walked in and out of their building. There were no confrontations.

This week, the INS deadline for registration was extended for another month by the Justice Department.

About 15,000 males age 16 or older from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan will have until March 21 to be fingerprinted, photographed and show certain documents at INS field offices.

Another group of about 19,000 from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait will have until April 25 to register, four weeks beyond the original March 28 deadline.

The registration program is part of an effort by the INS to tighten security at U.S. borders and track foreign visitors whose visas may have expired or who may be here illegally.

In all, about 46,000 students, tourists and people nationwide on business from 25 countries are being required to register if they want to stay in the United States for an extended period.

Seven suspected terrorists have been identified because of the program, along with 401 criminals or others who should not be permitted entry in the country, according to the Justice Department.