Surprise Attack! Revolution carried through by small conscious minorities

Surprise Attack! Revolution carried through by small conscious minorities
Kabul in the Republican Revolution of 1973

Saturday, September 1, 2007

An interview with UNITE-HERE ex-hotel worker and community organizer (Rebel Youth)

An interview with UNITE-HERE ex-hotel worker and community organizer
Youth on the Front Lines
By Asad Ali
(Rebel Youth, Fall/Winter 2007)

Have you ever eaten at a restaurant, or stayed in a hotel? If you answered yes you’ve probably used part of Canada’s $1.5 trillion tourism industry, over 40% of which is in Ontario and half of that (1) enters through Niagara, leaving Niagara Falls with a $700 million tourism industry of its own (2). According to StatsCan the Canadian tourism industry has an 18% profit rate (3), but is classified as the lowest paid (4). The second biggest employer of hotel workers in Niagara Falls (5) is Canadian Niagara Hotels (CNH), and the hotel workers with UNITE-HERE 2347 at the flagship Sheraton at the Falls have been fighting to defend their basic rights and contract since CNH bought it in 1993.

In 2006 an arbitrator was so affected by the disparity between the union’s and management’s proposed contract that he ruled that UNITE-HERE’s proposal would become the actual contract. CNH has continued its campaign of intimidation, however, and attacked the right to an 8-hour shift by splitting it so that the last 2 hours have to be done after a 2-hour window. Michelle Hemmingson, an activist and steward at the hotel, was fired and is now helping to keep the fight going as an organizer with Local 2347. Ethan Clarke is the Community Organizer for the local.

RY: What are some of the ways you’ve gotten support?

MH: I delivered a speech to some of the other union locals. They were really disgusted with how I was personally treated. They thought our (situation) was really bizarre and they realized that if we didn’t gather more of the other hotels they would become very similar. CNH is leading the way, the other ones follow in their footsteps

RY: Do the people working at CNH see it as the flagship?

MH: They know that their wages are much better off than anybody because when we get it (the contract) settled, the other ones will bump them up a little bit just to stay within reach.

RY: What’s been the role of younger members in the hotel?

MH: In the hotel industry in the summer it’s really busy and they do hire a lot of students. In housekeeping we have maybe 10 senior girls who have been there 9 or more years. Management would expect more from seniors. They know the seniors are staying, they want them to be above standard. But they know with the younger ones they can just use them. If they don’t do perfect that's fine, they’re just here for one season.

RY: How did this effect getting everyone to work together?

MH: Most of that was done by the more senior people who stuck around because we do it (arbitration) in the off season in January, but it did drag on until July. They said “here’s our (management’s version) collective agreement, if you sign it we’ll give you a $100 signing bonus”. So they brought in the Ministry of Labour to hold the vote, and I know the people inside said why would we want to vote yes on this if we can take a chance and actually get the union contract through arbitration

Management tried not to let us go when we wanted to (go to the management-organized vote). I tried to go on my break at 10:15 and I was told I was only allowed to go on my lunch break, 12:00. There were five of us who were told they couldn’t go and so we all gathered at 12:00 and went together anyway.

RY: When management attacked the union by splitting shifts what are some of the ways you kept members together?

MH: I purposefully worked that shift for a week just to see what it was like. What we tried to do on the inside was get as many members to say “yes I will work a split shift” just to see what they (management) would do. We had maybe ten at the most the first day and after that I think maybe half of them dropped out. People said “we’re sitting here from 8:30 in the morning till 8 at night and we'd like to help but we can't do it.”

When I went there and did my split shift to get the documentation of what kind of work we’d be doing, what they said was “work for six hours and then go off the property”. Couldn’t stay in the lunch room, we had to leave the property. I live in Welland, a 30 minute drive, and I have a four and a half year old son right now, so I would drive home after my shift, eat dinner, and come back. It was really a stretched week for me.

My last 2 hours of work they told me I’d be doing four more rooms. It didn’t turn out that way, there were no more rooms left. There were four of us left and three girls were given the option to either wash down guest room doors on two floors, sweep down the stairs different days, and one day they were to clean the elevator section.

I was given the job to go to the kitchen staff bathroom and clean the bathroom which nobody seemed to have done on a regular basis. It took me two shifts to clean three bathrooms. Their walls were yellow; people didn’t seem to know how to pick up a toilet seat. I don’t know how they got away with it health and safety standards-wise.

How come I clean the bathrooms and other girls are washing doors? And they were like “oh that’s just what you got to do”. They pulled anything they could together. Sometimes we would be waiting 15 minutes just to see what we would do. They didn’t (plan for us to work the split shift) and when I questioned the executive housekeeper at a meeting one time, “how come I can’t do that work from 3:30-5:30, why does it have to be split?”, she said “that’s just the way things are.”

People were really, really annoyed and I think right now it’s the busy season and they had (pressured) everybody to sign saying “I am willing to work 6 hour shifts” (rather then the eight they are entitled to). They’re short staffed again and people are saying “I'm only doing six.”

It’s hard work being a room attendant. “We need you to work eight hours Sunday” but on Monday “oh we only need you for six.” Morning or even at noon they’ll come and ask you, I’m like “no you should have scheduled me, I have a life outside work, people have childcare arrangements.”

Eventually they are going to realize, we should give them 8 hours.

EC: We figured that the difference is $480/month between a 30 and 40 hour week.

RY: What are some of the issues you experience as a woman working at the hotel?

MH: I was on the health and safety committee and being a woman (whenever) I would suggest they should do something differently, it was sort of just like shrug it off, “it’s not a health and safety issue, you shouldn’t really worry about it”. I was like “yeah, it technically is.”

RY: What are some of the reasons people say we have to take a stand here?

MH: What I always hear from the workers is the reason we put up with it is because of the pay. They’re one of the best paying hotels, a lot of them are saying they just want to basically work and go home, they don’t want to deal with the dramas that are going on inside. The majority are saying they just want to come to work and go home and just get their job done.

We have problems where we’re constantly out of sheets, and that puts us behind and they still just say “I just want to come to work and do my job”. Well how can you come to work if you don’t have the proper supplies? But “I don’t want to deal with it” and at the end of the day people stay late just to finish. We don’t know if they get paid or not, they don’t want to deal with the hassle but why work for free?

EC: Part of the contract we’ve been awarded says $100 dollars is to be paid out (to members on signing). CNH’s response was that it’s the union’s contract so the union should pay it (!). One of the most creative responses I’ve ever heard. When the boss takes 100 bucks out of their pocket, and the response is “I don’t want to make trouble”. We did manage to get a portion of the membership to sign a grievance on that.

(The experience with CNH is) slow down, slow down the grievance process. We had one person who got fired for stealing a piece of cake, it took two years to fight that. We do win things, it just takes a long time.

RY: what were some of the ways you were able to member-to-member get people on board for the signing bonus?

MH: I took a sheet and said we’re filing a grievance, we just need your signatures and explained everything to them, and then we got the majority. They thought the union should pay half and the company should pay half, because that’s what they were hearing. I was like “do you realize where the union gets their money from? It’s from your dues, so if you expect your union to pay you it’s like you taking money from your left pocket for your right pocket. The big steel companies they get their signing bonuses, the union’s not paying it. It’s the company who’s making the millions.”

RY: What are some of the first steps you recommend to other people who are in a similar situation?

MH: Don’t go out on a limb on your own, take everything slow. Don’t jump into something (where) you really don’t know what you’re doing. Ask for some training (from a union), ask a union rep definitely. Don’t do anything on the spur of the moment, think of the outcome.

When they rush into it they don’t realize they shouldn’t be doing it on work time when they’re investigating something or trying to get people to sign a petition. They don’t realize they could actually get into trouble from the company. People just starting out don’t realize stuff like that, they’re like “yeah I am doing union stuff I can do it at work”. No you can’t!

It’s very unpredictable. You could think just because you show up at a rally they’re not going to do anything because it was your day off, and then you walk back in and get a 5 day suspension for the smallest thing that you violated in their company handbook.

I would always expect the HR manager to find a loophole. It’s like we won the contract, we won the 8 hour shift: “yeah you can have the eight hour shift but they’re split!” But as you stand together I think you should be able to overcome those obstacles.

RY: What can people do to help?

MH: We don’t want to boycott.

EC: We would like people to go to Niagara Hotels, hear the stories of the workers, let CNH know you care how their workers are treated. If you’re in Niagara Falls talk to the workers directly. If you’re not, write to let the workers know that you’re hearing about their story (5914 Main St., Niagara Falls, ON L2G 5Z8). It can be e-mail (eclarke@unitehere.ca). Also follow our web site (www.niagarahotelworkers.ca/).

RY: What are some of the ways to survive when under attack, any tips you can give our readers?

MH: Just contact a union even if you are not one (a member). First I’d say don’t react by getting angry, trying think of ways to screw the employer, because you don’t want to do that. You don’t want to ruin your chance. Definitely don’t want to be insubordinate, do what they tell you anyway and then think of options that you have like options a, b, or c. Talk to your coworkers then go with the best decision that you guys come up with.

EC: Be strategic and work collectively.

RY: Is there anything else you would like our readers to know?

MH: From what I hear the other ones (hotels) are actually decent employers, management actually works together with the employees. They’re not barking commands, they’re trying to make work a happy little place to be.

RY: They let someone else do the dirty work for them?

MH: That’s exactly it

----
Sources:

1. “Quick Facts Sheet – Deputy Ministers Meeting”, Regional Municipality of Niagara, June 28, 2000.

3. “Cross-sectional analyses of performance and structure for Canada’s hotel industry” (#43), Gaston Levesque, Ministry of Industry, 2003.

4. “Job Quality continues to slide - Canada’s economy sheds another 12,000 manufacturing jobs in May”, Canadian Labour Congress, June 8, 2007.


5. City of Niagara Falls, http://www.niagarafalls.ca/business/business_profile/professional_services.asp

Monday, June 25, 2007

Who ever said anti-imperialist solidarity means solidarity with progressives only? (discussion contribution to Communist Party of Canada Central Convention)

 Who ever said anti-imperialist solidarity means solidarity with progressives only?

By Saleh Waziruddin

(Discussion contribution to 2007 35th Communist Party of Canada Central Convention, this was held back from being printed in the discussion bulletin by the Central Executive until a response was prepared to print side-by-side. Also the footnotes were omitted.)

You can choose your friends but not family. You can't choose who your ruling class invades, yet you still owe them anti-imperialist solidarity. This is like how we can't choose who our boss attacks at work, it might be a Tory or someone bad at their job but we still have to defend their rights because if we let the boss win everyone else is next. This simple idea is Lenin's concept of anti-imperialist solidarity in “Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism,” solidarity is NOT just with workers and progressives but with all forces targeted by imperialism abroad. Otherwise we and they will be a reserve for the boss in going after one and then the other. This is not because imperialism's targets are automatically progressive, but because of how imperialism works in pitting us against each other.

The Main Political Resolution (see Bulletin #1) is dogmatic about anti-imperialist solidarity, especially point #21 where it not only opposes solidarity with Iran's government just because it is targeted by imperialism (not reason enough?!) but puts words in the mouths of people like me saying we must think the Iranian government is pro-worker or progressive since we are calling for support with it, as if anti-imperialist solidarity is only for progressives! The Resolution rightfully declares solidarity with Latin American countries opposing imperialism, who themselves publicly support Iran's government, but conspicuously leaves out forces in Iraq and Afghanistan in hot battles with imperialism and giving it a run for its money.

This confusion about imperialism is part of a growing divide in the communist and progressive movement. The Lebanese CP recognizes Hezbollah and the Palestine People's Party recognizes Hamas as part of the anti-imperialist resistance and give it armed support even though Hezbollah and Hamas are not progressive1, and the Syrian CP2 called the Iranian election a victory for anti-imperialist resistance3. Not just communists: the ALBA countries (Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Cuba, Honduras under Zelaya, Nicaragua, and three Caribbean countries) who the Political Resolution is in solidarity with, and Brazil, have publicly supported Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government for being in imperialism's cross-hairs4.

On the other hand, some other communist parties have called these anti-imperialist forces a threat to the working class5. Recently People's Voice carried an interview by Junge Welt with CC First Secretary of the Tudeh Party6 where he correctly pointed out it is dogmatic to criticize the Iranian opposition for not being purely working class, but why shouldn't the same anti-dogmatism not apply to the Iranian government's anti-imperialism? In the interview the Tudeh leader denigrates Iran's refusal to give in to imperialism by comparing it with the Taliban's combat against imperialism, without giving a reason for why this isn't anti-imperialism. Isn't it objectively anti-imperialist (and natural!) when you are actually fighting armies occupying your country, or are under threat of invasion but hold on to sovereignty anyway? Yes, there are limitations to these forces, but who can deny that they are not surrendering to imperialism?

Iran's government and its President Ahmadinejad in particular are being viciously attacked in a propaganda campaign like the Iraq WMD claims. Even some communists have swallowed the lie that Ahmadinejad is a holocaust denier despite him protesting “I'm not saying it didn't happen”,7 or that he has threatened Israel, even though leftists unsympathatic to Ahmadinejad such as professor Juan Cole have refuted the latter as groundless8. In the recent interview Tudeh's leader was asked point-blank about these accusations but he didn't refute them. Tudeh Party's 2005 statement repeats the canard that Ahamdinejad called for “wiping Israel off the map.”9

At the Mexico-Canada-US Peace trilateral in October the Tudeh representative said that Iran wants to conquer the Islamic world. This is not something the Iranian government has said and simply doesn't have the means to do, although anyone concerned about someone conquering the Islamic word should look no further than the US which not only has the means but is occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, bombing Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan, declaring Syria and Iran to be next, and threatened Pakistan's government with being “bombed into the stone age!”10 Let's get realistic about who is a threat to the Islamic world let alone the whole world.

In Canada we're not only subject to anti-Iranian war propaganda that it's our duty to counter, but Canada has exceeded the UN's sanctions against Iran despite Iran's compliance with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Canada has banned direct air links with Iran and forbidden Iranian Cultural Centres11, which has nothing to do with nuclear weapons but isolates our peoples from each other. As Leninists it's our duty to break open this blockade, instead of joining our ruling class in condemning Iran's government.

Anti-imperialist solidarity is being counter-posed to solidarity with workers. British labour unions backed out of a resolution for immediate withdrawal from Iraq, a turn-around they credited solely to Abdullah Muhsin of the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions who is also of the Iraqi CP, whose open letter said withdrawal would be “bad for my country, bad for emerging progress forces, a terrible blow for trade unionism....”12. We should reject this kind of “solidarity”.

I propose that we replace point 21 of the Main Political Resolution (see Bulletin #1) with:

“We also express our solidarity with Iran which is the target of a campaign of slander and misinformation portraying it as a threat to other countries, as well as under UN sanctions despite complying with international treaties, and additional sanctions by the Government of Canada that make travel and contact between peoples of the two countries difficult.

We convey our revolutionary solidarity with the anti-imperialists in Iraq and Afghanistan resisting direct occupations by NATO countries including Canada, some of the most powerful and vicious military forces in human history. The successes of the resistance are a crisis for for the same ruling class we struggle against.”

1For LCP see “Amid the bombs, unity is forged”, Herbert Docena, Asia Times Online, Aug. 17, 2006 (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HH17Ak02.html); for PPP see “Deluge de feu sur le people de Gaza”, Pierre Barbancay, L'Humanite, Jan. 7 2009 (http://www.humanite.fr/2009-01-07_International_Deluge-de-feu-sur-le-peuple-de-Gaza)

2Lead by Wis'al Farha Bagdash

3 “Victory for Ahmadi-Nejad, a victory for the resistance option”, Peoples Voice issue 214, Jun. 18 to 24, 2009 (http://www.syriancp.org/ara/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1245259778&archive=&cnshow=news&start_from= )

4See for example Extraordinary ALBA-TCP statement of Jun. 24 2009 reaffirming “its support for the Islamic Revolution of Iran, the institutions of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and rejected foreign interference and the smear campaign waged against that sister nation”, available on the Venezuela CP web site http://www.pcv-venezuela.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5119&Itemid=98

5See for example South African CP's 10th Congress Resolution calling for struggle against “backward, xenophobic, and fundamentalist ideologies” (http://www.sacp.org.za/main.php?include=10thcongress/res.html)

6“Trust in Iranian Government Shattered”, interview with Ali Khavari, People's Voice Sept. 16-30, 2009

7“Iran's President: I don't deny holocaust”, New York Daily News, Sept. 24, 2007

9“Iranian Regime's Adventurism Gives Imperialists an Excuse to Intervene in Iran”, International Bulletin of the Tudeh Party of Iran, #230 Nov. 2005 (http://www.tudehpartyiran.org/TN_230_Nov05.pdf)

10“We'll bomb you to Stone Age, US told Pakistan”, The Times (UK), Sept. 22, 2006 (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article647188.ece)

11 “Canada-Iran Relations”, Government of Canada, Aug. 2008 (http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/iran/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/canada-iran.aspx?lang=eng&menu_id=8&menu=L)

12See Steve Warwick's, chair of UNISON Labour Link committee, report to the Labour Party conference of 2004 which includes the letter from Muhsin, available online at http://www.unison.org.uk/acrobat/B1608.pdf, the open letter is also available separately at http://www.unison.org.uk/acrobat/B1571.pdf

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Protesters support the 'Secret Trial Five' (Kitchener Record)

 Nadeem Lawji says he was outraged when he learned that Canadian officials could imprison suspects for years without laying charges against them.

(Copyright (c) 2007 The Record (Waterloo Region). All rightsreserved. )